Opportunity area · theme founders discuss · intermediate

Distribution approach for here dev agency where llm

Distribution · Here dev agency where llm. If you cannot explain who sends the first dollar, you do not have distribution—you have hope. Seed audience: community moderators-turned-builders. Original insight: community volume predicts attention, not willingness to pay—price a tiny pilot early.

Problem

Trust is thin. Anyone can claim a fix for “here dev agency where llm”; few can show a before/after on a real workflow with real data. Unexpected challenge: English-language threads overstate global demand; local budgets and compliance may differ. Hidden cost: QA/evaluation if any step is model-assisted—one bad output can kill the account.

Target user

Budget holders tired of agencies and spreadsheets for this job

Proposed solution

Sell a fixed-scope pilot with a dated success metric. Expand scope only after retention is boring. Distribution rule: track conversations started and pilots dated, not impressions. Counter-intuitive advice: stop reading adjacent threads for a week; talk to five humans instead. Distribution bottleneck: community fame without CRM hygiene is a leaky bucket. One caution: if you need the customer’s pristine historical data on day one, onboarding will kill conversion. One recommendation: this week, book five conversations and attempt a paid pilot for “here dev agency where llm” before writing more than a landing page. Practical next step: sketch trigger → mess → your path → proof. If proof is vague, you still have a vibe. Real-world pattern: early unscalable work (white-glove onboarding, manual QA) taught companies what to productize later. Straight take: keep the story small until numbers force it wider. Venture slides that promise to own all of ai ml are usually fiction.